PMworkingpaper(績(jī)效管理講座)(doc)

  文件類別:人力資源

  文件格式:文件格式

  文件大?。?0K

  下載次數(shù):69

  所需積分:2點(diǎn)

  解壓密碼:qg68.cn

  下載地址:[下載地址]

清華大學(xué)卓越生產(chǎn)運(yùn)營(yíng)總監(jiān)高級(jí)研修班

綜合能力考核表詳細(xì)內(nèi)容

PMworkingpaper(績(jī)效管理講座)(doc)
Steve Sherretta December 12, 2001 Performance Management: Enhancing Execution Through a Culture of Dialogue Peter is Chief Executive Officer for a medical supply multinational that recently crafted a new strategy to counter competitive threats. The plan stressed the need to cut cycle time, concentrate sales on higher-margin products and develop new markets. Four months after circulating the plan, Peter did a “walkaround” to see how things were going. He was appalled. Everywhere Peter turned people, departments—whole business units—simply didn’t “get it.” First surprise: Engineering. The group had cut product design time 30%, meeting its goal to increase speed-to-market. Good. Then Peter asked how manufacturing would be affected. It turned out the new design would take much more time to make. Total cycle time actually increased. “Our strategic plan message is not really getting through,” Peter thought. Second surprise: Sales. The new strategy called for a shift—emphasize high margin sales rather that pushing product down the pipeline as fast as possible. But just about every salesperson Peter spoke to was making transactional sales to high-volume customers; hardly anyone was building relationships with the most profitable prospects. Sales is doing just what it’s always done, Peter thought. Worst surprise: Even his top team, the people who’d helped him craft the strategy, was not sticking to plan. Peter asked a team member: “Why are you spending all your time making sure the new machinery is working instead of developing new markets?” “Because my unit’s chief goal was to improve on-time delivery,” he answered. “But what about company goals?” said Peter. “We came up with a good plan and communicated it very clearly. But nowhere it isn’t being carried out. Why?” Many organizations create good strategies, but only the best execute them effectively. Fortune magazine estimates that when CEOs fail, 70% of the time it’s because of bad execution.[1] Weak execution is pervasive in the business world, but the reasons for it are largely misunderstood. Why is it that no one in Peter’s organization was acting in sync with the strategy? Unless we understand the reasons, we can’t hope to solve the problem. Imagine someone hitting a tennis ball. When the brain says “hit the ball,” it doesn’t automatically happen. The message travels through nerve pathways down the arm and crosses gaps between the nerve cells. These gaps, or “synapses,” are potential breaks in the connection. If neurotransmitters don’t carry the message across the gap, the message never gets through, or it gets distorted. When that happens, either the arm doesn’t move at all, or it moves the wrong way. Creating a “culture of dialogue” Just like a nervous system, organizations also have gaps that block and distort messages. The secret to effective strategy execution lies in crossing hierarchical and functional gaps with clear, consistent messages that relay the strategy throughout the organization. Sound simple? It’s not. The reason is that the “neurotransmitters” in organizations are human beings—executive team members, senior managers, middle managers and supervisors—whose job it is to make sure that people’s behavior is aligned with the overall strategy. Doing what it takes to achieve alignment is very difficult. It is what Ram Charan calls, the “heavy lifting” of management, and it’s the key to executing strategy. As we’ll see later, there is an important difference between companies that successfully align behavior with strategy and those that do not. Companies that effectively execute strategy create a “culture of dialogue.” A culture of dialogue encourages pervasive two-way communications where individuals and groups 1) question, challenge, interpret and ultimately clarify strategic objectives; and 2) engage in regular performance dialogue to monitor behavior and ensure it is aligned with strategy. Three keys to managing performance A culture of dialogue doesn’t happen instantly, any more than a fluid tennis stroke does. It takes practice, persistence and hard work. So how exactly can leaders ensure that strategy messages go all the way down the line—that the tennis ball gets hit correctly? The three keys to managing performance effectively are: 1. Achieving radical clarity by decoding strategy at the top. Many organizations think they send clear signals but don’t. In some cases, managers subordinate broad strategic goals to operational goals within their silos. That’s what happened with Peter’s top team. Elsewhere, top team members often have too many “top” priorities—we’ve seen as many as 100 in one case—which results in mixed signals and blurred focus. Strategy decode requires winnowing priorities down to a manageable number—as little as five. 2. Setting up systems and processes to ensure clarity. Once strategy is clear, organizations must create processes to ensure that the right strategy messages cascade down the organization. These include: strategy-centered budget and planning sessions; staff and team meetings to discuss goals; performance management meetings; and talent review sessions. Dialogue drives all these processes. Each represents a “transmitter opportunity,” where strategic messages are conveyed and behavior is aligned with goals. 3. Aligning and differentiating rewards. Leaders must make sure rewards encourage behaviors consistent with strategy, which sounds easy but isn’t. Differentiation is about making sure that stars get significantly more than poor performers. But almost everywhere managers distribute rewards more or less evenly. As we’ll see, lack of effective performance dialogue is a key contributor to dysfunctional reward schemes. We list these three items separately but they are, of course, interconnected. Systems and processes depend on clarity from the top. Differentiation and alignment of rewards depend on managers using performance systems effectively. Dialogue is the glue that holds it all together. But not just any dialogue will do. It must be dialogue with purpose, focused on performance. Link to company valuation Companies that manage performance well—General Electric comes to mind—have higher market valuations. Why? Because, more and more, institutional investors view strategy execution as a vital factor influencing stock prices. Just a few years ago institutional investors relied almost exclusively on financial measures for company valuations. Now 35% of a market valuation is influenced by non-financial, intangible factors, according to a study by Ernst & Young.[2] The study showed that “execution of corporate strategy” and “management credibility” ranked number one and number two in importance to institutional investors out of 22 non-financial measures. John Inch, a managing director and analyst at Bear Stearns notes that in some sectors, such as diversified industrial companies, intangibles account for even more—up to half a company’s value. “You can take even a mundane asset and inject good management and have something pretty strong,” says Inch. 1. Achieve Radical Clarity by decoding strategy at the top The first step in successfully executing strategy is achieving clarity on the top team, which is frequently the source of garbled signals. Lack of Clarity at the Top A recent Hay Group study[3] shows a disturbing lack of clarity on top teams (organizational clarity measures the extent to which employees understand what is expected of them and how those expectations connect with the organization’s larger goals). The chart below shows dramatically higher levels of clarity on outstanding vs. average teams. In fact the biggest single difference between great and average top teams and typical ones was in the level of internal clarity. See Figure 1. Figure 1: Organizational Climate and Teams [pic] [Change Hay/McBer to “Source: Hay Group, Inc.” in final version] And a Lack of Clarity Below Workers at lower levels strongly feel this lack of clarity. Figure 2 looks at satisfaction levels for workers planning to leave their organizations within two years versus those planning to stay longer. This study showed that a key reason people leave their jobs is that they feel their companies lack direction. Even among employees planning to stay more than two years at their companies, only 57% felt their organizations had a clear sense of direction. Figure 2: Key reasons why employees leave their companies | | Total % | | |Satisfied[4] | |Satisfaction with: |Employees planning|Employees |GAP | | |to stay more than |planning to leave|(%) | | |two years (%) |in less than two | | | | |years (%) | | |1. Use of my skills and |83% |49% |34% | |abilities | | | | |2. Ability of top |74% |41% |33% | |management | | | | |3. Company has clear |57% |27% |30% | |sense of direction | | | | [NOTE; HIGHLIGHT SECTION 3; MAKE IT POP GRAPHICALLY] Clarity matters Why do employees crave clarity? Think about it. What could be more demoralizing than the realization that your hard work is not contributing to overall company goals? Employees want to do the “right” thing, but they can only do so if they know what the right things are. Unfortunately, as we saw in our opening vignette, companies often don’t communicate strategic goals effectively. An oil refinery client, for example, set a strategic goal to cut costs. To see how we...
PMworkingpaper(績(jī)效管理講座)(doc)
 

[下載聲明]
1.本站的所有資料均為資料作者提供和網(wǎng)友推薦收集整理而來(lái),僅供學(xué)習(xí)和研究交流使用。如有侵犯到您版權(quán)的,請(qǐng)來(lái)電指出,本站將立即改正。電話:010-82593357。
2、訪問(wèn)管理資源網(wǎng)的用戶必須明白,本站對(duì)提供下載的學(xué)習(xí)資料等不擁有任何權(quán)利,版權(quán)歸該下載資源的合法擁有者所有。
3、本站保證站內(nèi)提供的所有可下載資源都是按“原樣”提供,本站未做過(guò)任何改動(dòng);但本網(wǎng)站不保證本站提供的下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性;同時(shí)本網(wǎng)站也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對(duì)自己和他人造成任何形式的損失或傷害。
4、未經(jīng)本網(wǎng)站的明確許可,任何人不得大量鏈接本站下載資源;不得復(fù)制或仿造本網(wǎng)站。本網(wǎng)站對(duì)其自行開發(fā)的或和他人共同開發(fā)的所有內(nèi)容、技術(shù)手段和服務(wù)擁有全部知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán),任何人不得侵害或破壞,也不得擅自使用。

 我要上傳資料,請(qǐng)點(diǎn)我!
 管理工具分類
ISO認(rèn)證課程講義管理表格合同大全法規(guī)條例營(yíng)銷資料方案報(bào)告說(shuō)明標(biāo)準(zhǔn)管理戰(zhàn)略商業(yè)計(jì)劃書市場(chǎng)分析戰(zhàn)略經(jīng)營(yíng)策劃方案培訓(xùn)講義企業(yè)上市采購(gòu)物流電子商務(wù)質(zhì)量管理企業(yè)名錄生產(chǎn)管理金融知識(shí)電子書客戶管理企業(yè)文化報(bào)告論文項(xiàng)目管理財(cái)務(wù)資料固定資產(chǎn)人力資源管理制度工作分析績(jī)效考核資料面試招聘人才測(cè)評(píng)崗位管理職業(yè)規(guī)劃KPI績(jī)效指標(biāo)勞資關(guān)系薪酬激勵(lì)人力資源案例人事表格考勤管理人事制度薪資表格薪資制度招聘面試表格崗位分析員工管理薪酬管理績(jī)效管理入職指引薪酬設(shè)計(jì)績(jī)效管理績(jī)效管理培訓(xùn)績(jī)效管理方案平衡計(jì)分卡績(jī)效評(píng)估績(jī)效考核表格人力資源規(guī)劃安全管理制度經(jīng)營(yíng)管理制度組織機(jī)構(gòu)管理辦公總務(wù)管理財(cái)務(wù)管理制度質(zhì)量管理制度會(huì)計(jì)管理制度代理連鎖制度銷售管理制度倉(cāng)庫(kù)管理制度CI管理制度廣告策劃制度工程管理制度采購(gòu)管理制度生產(chǎn)管理制度進(jìn)出口制度考勤管理制度人事管理制度員工福利制度咨詢?cè)\斷制度信息管理制度員工培訓(xùn)制度辦公室制度人力資源管理企業(yè)培訓(xùn)績(jī)效考核其它
人才招聘 免責(zé)聲明 常見問(wèn)題 廣告服務(wù) 聯(lián)系方式 隱私保護(hù) 積分規(guī)則 關(guān)于我們 登陸幫助 友情鏈接
COPYRIGT @ 2001-2018 HTTP://fanshiren.cn INC. ALL RIGHTS RESERVED. 管理資源網(wǎng) 版權(quán)所有