12 總統(tǒng) 論(doc)
綜合能力考核表詳細(xì)內(nèi)容
12 總統(tǒng) 論(doc)
12. Presidential Debates Debates among candidates are rare in most countries. But they have become a staple1 of American politics, particularly during the last 25 years. Americans like debates because the candidates can be compared in an unscripted, live performance. The candidates don't know what questions will be asked, nor what their opponent might say. History indicates that a bad performance, particularly a telling gaffe2, can badly damage a candidate in the polls. The debates are a “ key test” of the strength and abilities of the candidates, says CNN analyst Jeff Greenfield. A candidate cannot package himself in debates the way he can in party advertisements but must be quick on his feet3 to respond to unanticipated4 questions and criticisms, he adds. The unforgettable debate quip5 that can deflate6 a candidacy is the worst nightmare of any presidential hopeful.“ There you go again” , Ronald Reagan's memorable retort7 to President Jimmy Carter, was a line8 that stuck with both viewers and commentators in the l980 presidential campaign. Carter went on to lose the election, polls showed mostly because of the economy. But Carter's debate performance didn't help. Another example was Vice President Walter Mondale's deadly question to Senator Gary Hart, his main competitor in the 1984 Democratic primaries, “ Where's the beef?” Mondale borrowed the line from a hamburger commercial that had used the phrase to suggest that competing products shortchanged9 the consumer. Mondale, in effect, suggested that Hart's ideas were short on substance. The potential of debates to damage a vulnerable presidential hopeful is one reason why some candidates, particularly frontrunners10, are reluctant to risk their chances in such an uncontrolled environment--and the fewer debate rules there are,the less control the candidates have.But broadcast presidential debates,both in the primaries and in the general election,are now routine and expected by the American people. It was not always so. Face-to-face presidential debates began their broadcast history in 1948 when Republicans Thomas Dewey and Harold Stassen faced each other in a radio debate during the Oregon Republican presidential primary. The first broadcast television debates between the two major party nominees were in 1960 when Senator John F. Kennedy faced Vice President Richard Nixon.The debates were considered crucial to Kennedy’ s narrow11 victory. Interestingly, Americans who heard the debate on radio thought Nixon had won. But the far larger television audience applauded Kennedy's performance, testimony to the importance--in the television age--of image as well as substance. The point is Americans are concerned not just with a leader's policies and ideology12, but also with his character and temperament13. In the contentious14 atmosphere of a debate, such personal attributes15 are easier for voters to judge than in pre-packaged campaign commercials or formal speeches. Because television debates were deemed so crucial to the outcome of the 1960 election--dooming Richard Nixon to a narrow loss in the opinion of many analysts--the presidential nominees in the subsequent three presidential elections shield16 away from debates, feeling the risks were too great. Not until 1976 when Georgia Governor Jimmy Carter confronted President Gerald Ford was there another presidential debate. Since then, there have been debates in each of the presiden tial election years. The American people now expect them and it is doubtful a candidate could refuse to participate, analysts say. Since 1987, the presidential debates have been organized by the bipartisan17 organization, the Commission on Presidential Debates. Its purpose is to sponsor and produce debates for the presidential and vice presidential candidates of the two major parties. In Election 2000, the commission set a threshold18 for the participation of third party candidates in the debates. They must show they have the support--as evidenced in a number of opinion polls--of at least 15 percent of the population. Whatever the quality of the debates in Election 2000, they are unlikely to equal the most famous political debates in American history which occurred long before the invention of radio and television. In 1858, Stephen Douglas debated Abraham Lincoln for a U.S. Senate seat. The debates were held at seven sites throughout Illinois, one for each of the seven congressional districts. Douglas, a pro-slavery Democrat,was the incumbent19.Lincoln was anti-slavery. “ Honest Abe,” as he was endearingly called, lost the Senate race, but two years later was elected the first Republican president of the United States. The Lincoln
12 總統(tǒng) 論(doc)
12. Presidential Debates Debates among candidates are rare in most countries. But they have become a staple1 of American politics, particularly during the last 25 years. Americans like debates because the candidates can be compared in an unscripted, live performance. The candidates don't know what questions will be asked, nor what their opponent might say. History indicates that a bad performance, particularly a telling gaffe2, can badly damage a candidate in the polls. The debates are a “ key test” of the strength and abilities of the candidates, says CNN analyst Jeff Greenfield. A candidate cannot package himself in debates the way he can in party advertisements but must be quick on his feet3 to respond to unanticipated4 questions and criticisms, he adds. The unforgettable debate quip5 that can deflate6 a candidacy is the worst nightmare of any presidential hopeful.“ There you go again” , Ronald Reagan's memorable retort7 to President Jimmy Carter, was a line8 that stuck with both viewers and commentators in the l980 presidential campaign. Carter went on to lose the election, polls showed mostly because of the economy. But Carter's debate performance didn't help. Another example was Vice President Walter Mondale's deadly question to Senator Gary Hart, his main competitor in the 1984 Democratic primaries, “ Where's the beef?” Mondale borrowed the line from a hamburger commercial that had used the phrase to suggest that competing products shortchanged9 the consumer. Mondale, in effect, suggested that Hart's ideas were short on substance. The potential of debates to damage a vulnerable presidential hopeful is one reason why some candidates, particularly frontrunners10, are reluctant to risk their chances in such an uncontrolled environment--and the fewer debate rules there are,the less control the candidates have.But broadcast presidential debates,both in the primaries and in the general election,are now routine and expected by the American people. It was not always so. Face-to-face presidential debates began their broadcast history in 1948 when Republicans Thomas Dewey and Harold Stassen faced each other in a radio debate during the Oregon Republican presidential primary. The first broadcast television debates between the two major party nominees were in 1960 when Senator John F. Kennedy faced Vice President Richard Nixon.The debates were considered crucial to Kennedy’ s narrow11 victory. Interestingly, Americans who heard the debate on radio thought Nixon had won. But the far larger television audience applauded Kennedy's performance, testimony to the importance--in the television age--of image as well as substance. The point is Americans are concerned not just with a leader's policies and ideology12, but also with his character and temperament13. In the contentious14 atmosphere of a debate, such personal attributes15 are easier for voters to judge than in pre-packaged campaign commercials or formal speeches. Because television debates were deemed so crucial to the outcome of the 1960 election--dooming Richard Nixon to a narrow loss in the opinion of many analysts--the presidential nominees in the subsequent three presidential elections shield16 away from debates, feeling the risks were too great. Not until 1976 when Georgia Governor Jimmy Carter confronted President Gerald Ford was there another presidential debate. Since then, there have been debates in each of the presiden tial election years. The American people now expect them and it is doubtful a candidate could refuse to participate, analysts say. Since 1987, the presidential debates have been organized by the bipartisan17 organization, the Commission on Presidential Debates. Its purpose is to sponsor and produce debates for the presidential and vice presidential candidates of the two major parties. In Election 2000, the commission set a threshold18 for the participation of third party candidates in the debates. They must show they have the support--as evidenced in a number of opinion polls--of at least 15 percent of the population. Whatever the quality of the debates in Election 2000, they are unlikely to equal the most famous political debates in American history which occurred long before the invention of radio and television. In 1858, Stephen Douglas debated Abraham Lincoln for a U.S. Senate seat. The debates were held at seven sites throughout Illinois, one for each of the seven congressional districts. Douglas, a pro-slavery Democrat,was the incumbent19.Lincoln was anti-slavery. “ Honest Abe,” as he was endearingly called, lost the Senate race, but two years later was elected the first Republican president of the United States. The Lincoln
12 總統(tǒng) 論(doc)
[下載聲明]
1.本站的所有資料均為資料作者提供和網(wǎng)友推薦收集整理而來,僅供學(xué)習(xí)和研究交流使用。如有侵犯到您版權(quán)的,請來電指出,本站將立即改正。電話:010-82593357。
2、訪問管理資源網(wǎng)的用戶必須明白,本站對提供下載的學(xué)習(xí)資料等不擁有任何權(quán)利,版權(quán)歸該下載資源的合法擁有者所有。
3、本站保證站內(nèi)提供的所有可下載資源都是按“原樣”提供,本站未做過任何改動(dòng);但本網(wǎng)站不保證本站提供的下載資源的準(zhǔn)確性、安全性和完整性;同時(shí)本網(wǎng)站也不承擔(dān)用戶因使用這些下載資源對自己和他人造成任何形式的損失或傷害。
4、未經(jīng)本網(wǎng)站的明確許可,任何人不得大量鏈接本站下載資源;不得復(fù)制或仿造本網(wǎng)站。本網(wǎng)站對其自行開發(fā)的或和他人共同開發(fā)的所有內(nèi)容、技術(shù)手段和服務(wù)擁有全部知識(shí)產(chǎn)權(quán),任何人不得侵害或破壞,也不得擅自使用。
我要上傳資料,請點(diǎn)我!
管理工具分類
ISO認(rèn)證課程講義管理表格合同大全法規(guī)條例營銷資料方案報(bào)告說明標(biāo)準(zhǔn)管理戰(zhàn)略商業(yè)計(jì)劃書市場分析戰(zhàn)略經(jīng)營策劃方案培訓(xùn)講義企業(yè)上市采購物流電子商務(wù)質(zhì)量管理企業(yè)名錄生產(chǎn)管理金融知識(shí)電子書客戶管理企業(yè)文化報(bào)告論文項(xiàng)目管理財(cái)務(wù)資料固定資產(chǎn)人力資源管理制度工作分析績效考核資料面試招聘人才測評崗位管理職業(yè)規(guī)劃KPI績效指標(biāo)勞資關(guān)系薪酬激勵(lì)人力資源案例人事表格考勤管理人事制度薪資表格薪資制度招聘面試表格崗位分析員工管理薪酬管理績效管理入職指引薪酬設(shè)計(jì)績效管理績效管理培訓(xùn)績效管理方案平衡計(jì)分卡績效評估績效考核表格人力資源規(guī)劃安全管理制度經(jīng)營管理制度組織機(jī)構(gòu)管理辦公總務(wù)管理財(cái)務(wù)管理制度質(zhì)量管理制度會(huì)計(jì)管理制度代理連鎖制度銷售管理制度倉庫管理制度CI管理制度廣告策劃制度工程管理制度采購管理制度生產(chǎn)管理制度進(jìn)出口制度考勤管理制度人事管理制度員工福利制度咨詢診斷制度信息管理制度員工培訓(xùn)制度辦公室制度人力資源管理企業(yè)培訓(xùn)績效考核其它
精品推薦
- 1暗促-酒店玫瑰靜悄悄地開 369
- 2終端陳列十五大原則 383
- 3專業(yè)廣告運(yùn)作模式 345
- 4****主營業(yè)務(wù)發(fā)展戰(zhàn)略設(shè)計(jì) 375
- 5中小企業(yè)物流發(fā)展的對策 394
- 6主顧開拓 482
- 7主動(dòng)推進(jìn)的客戶服務(wù) 343
- 8專業(yè)媒體策劃與購買 372
- 9中遠(yuǎn)電視廣告CF 417
下載排行
- 1社會(huì)保障基礎(chǔ)知識(shí)(ppt) 16695
- 2安全生產(chǎn)事故案例分析(ppt 16695
- 3行政專員崗位職責(zé) 16695
- 4品管部崗位職責(zé)與任職要求 16695
- 5員工守則 16695
- 6軟件驗(yàn)收報(bào)告 16695
- 7問卷調(diào)查表(范例) 16695
- 8工資發(fā)放明細(xì)表 16695
- 9文件簽收單 16695